Ruby vs Green
Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:18 pm
So i spent some time to have a look at the new FS capabilitys compared to RIP SM. Though i really like to dive deeper into ruby i'm right at the point where i ask myself which parts of my old projects are worth to be converted into ruby and what benefits could i get from it?
My conclusion so far: As long as i don't need any additional functionality introduced by ruby i'll get nothing than much work with just some educational values.
One of my hopes was that i could decrease at least some GUI CPU cycles but it seems that ruby can't do any better than a more or less trigger optimized green version.
So the simple question is, am i right with my assumption or do i overlook some obvious aspects? Does it make any sense to "recode" green modules with ruby? Or even worse... could ruby at the actual point of implementation cause some unwanted side effects?
My conclusion so far: As long as i don't need any additional functionality introduced by ruby i'll get nothing than much work with just some educational values.
One of my hopes was that i could decrease at least some GUI CPU cycles but it seems that ruby can't do any better than a more or less trigger optimized green version.
So the simple question is, am i right with my assumption or do i overlook some obvious aspects? Does it make any sense to "recode" green modules with ruby? Or even worse... could ruby at the actual point of implementation cause some unwanted side effects?