The old but never satisfyingly answered question

For general discussion related FlowStone
User avatar
trogluddite
Posts: 1730
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:46 am
Location: Yorkshire, UK

Re: The old but never satisfyingly answered question

Post by trogluddite »

Spogg wrote:Dare we conclude that cross-fading is type of morphing, or should I duck for cover?

It should only called cross-fading once the controversy has made everyone cross enough! [ducking] :lol:

tulamide wrote:...the second is a blend...

For a concise control name, I find "blend" very fitting - descriptive and suggesting something slightly more involved than a static oscillator "mix".

tulamide wrote:trog just gave the ultimate answer: a big knob labelled "morph"

If not quite as succinctly as Adam's visuals! I'm a great believer in the old saying; "1000 words is worth a picture!" (or is it the other way around?) :lol:
All schematics/modules I post are free for all to use - but a credit is always polite!
Don't stagnate, mutate to create!
MichaelBenjamin
Posts: 275
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:32 pm

Re: The old but never satisfyingly answered question

Post by MichaelBenjamin »

.
Last edited by MichaelBenjamin on Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
RJHollins
Posts: 1573
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:58 pm

Re: The old but never satisfyingly answered question

Post by RJHollins »

.... and of course, I hesitate the mention of:

'Dissolve' :P
Post Reply