If you have a problem or need to report a bug please email : support@dsprobotics.com
There are 3 sections to this support area:
DOWNLOADS: access to product manuals, support files and drivers
HELP & INFORMATION: tutorials and example files for learning or finding pre-made modules for your projects
USER FORUMS: meet with other users and exchange ideas, you can also get help and assistance here
NEW REGISTRATIONS - please contact us if you wish to register on the forum
Users are reminded of the forum rules they sign up to which prohibits any activity that violates any laws including posting material covered by copyright
Search found 5 matches
- Tue Dec 06, 2022 8:26 pm
- Forum: DSP
- Topic: Peak detector (is it good ??)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 29327
Re: Peak detector (is it good ??)
Hello,
I'm not sure I understand everything you're saying, but to me it seems that you might be overcomplicating the task. In my experience the best way to separate transients from the rest is by using a simple envelope follower. The parts in the input signal that are louder than the follower's ...
I'm not sure I understand everything you're saying, but to me it seems that you might be overcomplicating the task. In my experience the best way to separate transients from the rest is by using a simple envelope follower. The parts in the input signal that are louder than the follower's ...
- Sun Sep 11, 2016 2:43 pm
- Forum: DSP
- Topic: Lookahead limiter
- Replies: 15
- Views: 69560
Re: Lookahead limiter
Yes, it can be modified to calculate min, max and sum (average=sum/bufferSize).
Nice! So if you calculate the average of the buffer after "max from buffer" twice with half the window size, you should end up with a very smooth, accurate and cpu-efficient lookahead curve, as far as I'm concerned ...
Nice! So if you calculate the average of the buffer after "max from buffer" twice with half the window size, you should end up with a very smooth, accurate and cpu-efficient lookahead curve, as far as I'm concerned ...
- Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:21 pm
- Forum: DSP
- Topic: Lookahead limiter
- Replies: 15
- Views: 69560
Re: Lookahead limiter
Hi, I've done some research and it turns out it is possible to implement the "max from array" in O(1) steps (meaning the overall CPU usage will be independent of array-size). Here's a module I've made.
Wow, this truly is powerful. Thank you for the find indeed!
Filters do make a lot of ...
Wow, this truly is powerful. Thank you for the find indeed!
Filters do make a lot of ...
- Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:49 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: I support 64Bit development
- Replies: 265
- Views: 2013490
Re: I support 64Bit development
Also I believe most new PCs are pre-loaded with 64 bit Windows and many will not want to re-install their OS for 1 application.
Generally speaking 64 bit Windows' can run 32 bit hosts (which of course widely support 32 bit plugins), and even with 64 bit hosts you'll be able to bridge plugins from ...
Generally speaking 64 bit Windows' can run 32 bit hosts (which of course widely support 32 bit plugins), and even with 64 bit hosts you'll be able to bridge plugins from ...
- Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:32 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: I support 64Bit development
- Replies: 265
- Views: 2013490
Re: I support 64Bit development
Yes, I'm totally in for this!
This is probably my first post in the FS forum, but I visit here almost every day. I've been using SM/FS for about 3 years now, and I'm sure there are more people like me who are not actively posting but use FS all the time, and would like to have the 64-bit support ...
This is probably my first post in the FS forum, but I visit here almost every day. I've been using SM/FS for about 3 years now, and I'm sure there are more people like me who are not actively posting but use FS all the time, and would like to have the 64-bit support ...